The limitations of the current protein classification tools in identifying lipolytic features in putative bacterial lipase sequences.

Metagenomics sequencing has generated millions of new protein sequences, most of them with unknown functions. A relatively quick first step for function assignment is to use the existing public protein databases and their scanning tools. However, to date these tools are not able to identify all sequence features like conserved motifs or patterns. In this study we evaluated the capability of several protein public databases (e.g., InterPro, PROSITE, ESTHER, pfam, AlphaFold etc) and their scanning tools for identifying lipolytic features in 78 putative cold-adapted bacterial lipase sequences. Novel lipases that can tolerate extreme conditions have great biotechnological importance. We obtained the putative cold-adapted lipolytic sequences from the metagenomic study of anaerobic psychrophilic microbial community treating domestic wastewater at 4 and 15 â„ƒ. Both newer and conventional protein classifiers failed to find lipolytic features for most of the putative lipases. InterProScan predicted lipase family membership for only 18 of the putative lipase sequences. For more than half of them (41 out of 78) InterProScan could not predict any protein family membership, let alone find lipolytic features in them. However, when the Lipase Engineering Database and AlphaFold were used, half of those sequences were classified. Conventional databases like PROSITE could find lipolytic patterns for 9 of the putative lipolytic sequences of which only one was identified by InterProScan as a lipase. Moreover, different scanning tools made different and inconsistent predictions for a certain putative lipase sequence. Even InterProScan, which integrates predictions from 13 protein member databases, did not have a consensus prediction for a certain lipase sequence. Our study shows that there is lack of information in public protein databases about bacterial lipase sequences and this limits their lipolytic feature prediction and biotechnological application. The integration of AlphaFold within the InterPro can improve the lipase identification and classification significantly.

Looking for lipases and lipolytic organisms in low-temperature anaerobic reactors treating domestic wastewater.

Poor lipid degradation limits low-temperature anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater even when psychrophiles are used. We combined metagenomics and metaproteomics to find lipolytic bacteria and their potential, and actual, cold-adapted extracellular lipases in anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating domestic wastewater at 4 and 15 °C. Of the 40 recovered putative lipolytic metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), only three (Chlorobium, Desulfobacter, and Mycolicibacterium) were common and abundant (relative abundance ≥ 1%) in all reactors. Notably, some MAGs that represented aerobic autotrophs contained lipases. Therefore, we hypothesised that the lipases we found are not always associated with exogenous lipid degradation and can have other roles such as polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) accumulation/degradation and interference with the outer membranes of other bacteria. Metaproteomics did not provide sufficient proteome coverage for relatively lower abundant proteins such as lipases though the expression of fadL genes, long-chain fatty acid transporters, was confirmed for four genera (Dechloromonas, Azoarcus, Aeromonas and Sulfurimonas), none of which were recovered as putative lipolytic MAGs. Metaproteomics also confirmed the presence of 15 relatively abundant (≥ 1%) genera in all reactors, of which at least 6 can potentially accumulate lipid/polyhydroxyalkanoates. For most putative lipolytic MAGs, there was no statistically significant correlation between the read abundance and reactor conditions such as temperature, phase (biofilm and bulk liquid), and feed type (treated by ultraviolet light or not). Results obtained by metagenomics and metaproteomics did not confirm each other and extracellular lipases and lipolytic bacteria were not easily identifiable in the anaerobic membrane reactors used in this study. Further work is required to identify the true lipid degraders in these systems.

Low-Temperature Pretreatment of Organic Feedstocks with Selected Mineral Wastes Sustains Anaerobic Digestion Stability through Trace Metal Release.

A low-cost approach for enhancing mesophilic (37 °C) anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic waste using a low-temperature (37 °C) pretreatment with different mineral wastes (MW) was investigated. A higher and stable methane production rate, in comparison to MW-free controls, was achieved for 80 days at organic loading rates of 1-2 g VS/L·d, using a feed substrate pretreated with incinerator bottom ash (IBA). The boiler ash and cement-based waste pretreatments also produced high methane production rates but with some process instability. In contrast, an incinerator fly ash pretreatment showed a progressive decrease in methane production rates and poor process stability, leading to reactor failure after 40 days. To avoid process instability and/or reactor failure, two metrics had to be met: (a) a methanogenesis to fermentation ratio higher than 0.6 and (b) a cell-specific methanogenic activity to cell-specific fermentation activity ratio of >1000. The prevalence of Methanofastidiosum together with a mixed community of acetoclastic (Methanosaeta) and hydrogenotrophic (Methanobacterium) methanogens in the stable IBA treatment indicated the importance of Methanofastidiosum as a potential indicator of a healthy and stable reactor.